The United States has announced that it will leave 66 international organisations, marking a major change in its foreign policy. The decision was made by the US government as part of its plan to reduce involvement in global institutions.
According to officials, the US will stop taking part in 31 organisations linked to the United Nations and 35 other international bodies. The government said these groups no longer support US national interests and are not delivering results.
Why the US Is Leaving
US leaders said many of these organisations are costly, inefficient, or work against American priorities. The move is part of the government’s policy to focus more on domestic issues and reduce spending on global institutions.
Officials also said the US wants to deal with countries directly instead of working through large international groups.
Key Organisations Affected
Some of the organisations the US is leaving include climate and energy groups, labour and development bodies, and policy forums linked to the United Nations. This includes climate-related organisations that work on global warming, renewable energy, and environmental research.
The US has also decided to exit the International Solar Alliance, which is led by India and focuses on promoting solar energy worldwide.
Global Reaction
The decision has received mixed reactions. Supporters say it will save taxpayer money and give the US more control over its foreign policy. Critics say leaving global organisations may weaken international cooperation and reduce the US role in solving global problems.
Experts have warned that this move could slow global efforts on climate change and create space for other countries to increase their influence on the world stage.
What This Means Going Forward
By exiting these organisations, the US is moving away from multilateral cooperation, where many countries work together. Instead, the government plans to focus more on bilateral relations, which means working directly with individual countries.
World leaders are watching closely to see how this decision will affect global cooperation on issues like climate change, trade, health, and international security.